How is it different?

Here's a question? If there are a group of people being killed for no reason and that group of people were being killed by someone who could kill a bunch of us...is that any different from a group of people being killed over drugs by someone who could kill a bunch of us? I say getting killed over drugs...is fuc*ed up. But getting killed for no reason? I cant even explain how much I think that is worse. I believe 99% of people who think about this would agree with me.

So why do I bring this up? When President Bush sent our troops to Iraq/Afghanistan it was for the first reason, people being killed for no reason. Many democrats and some republicans found this a horrible reason to go to war and they still hold this notion towards the war. Now however in Mexico hillary clinton has come forward and said "We need to help!"

But hillary is classified as a democrat and I believe she vowed that if elected she would "Have our troops home within 6months". If she is so against war, then why would she want us to go help in Mexico? Does she think we're going to go over there and negotiate peace between the police and the drug cartels? Give me a break.

Can someone explain how this makes sense to me?

Im Back

I know there is absolutely no one in this world that is disappointed I have abandoned my blog, but just in case there is...I am back!!!! And this time stronger than ever...